F​or a review of the element of possession, click here
​
Unauthorized Transfer of a Firearm: Section 99(1)
​
-
The meaning of “transfer” in s. 84(1) does not include “offer to purchase” a firearm: R v Bienvenue, 2016 ONCA 865 at para 5
​
Using Firearm in Commission of Offence: Section 85
-
In order to sustain a conviction under section 85(2), the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm was actually used to facilitate the commission of the predicate offence; mere possession of a firearm is insufficient: R v Andrade, 2015 ONCA 499 at paras 30, 33-37
-
As a precondition, the Crown must prove that the accused committed the predicate offence: Andrade at para 29
-
Weapons Dangerous, Section 88(1)
-
Actus Reus
-
the actus reus is made out upon establishing that the accused possessed the weapon: R v Andrade, 2015 ONCA 499 at para 36
-
-
Mens Rea
-
s. 88(1) is a “specific intent” offence requiring proof that the appellant’s subjective purpose in possessing the weapon was objectively dangerous to the public peace: R v Andrade, 2015 ONCA 499 at paras 15, 35
-
The trier of fact must find that the appellant possessed the weapon for a purpose dangerous to the public peace – not just for a dangerous purpose. The purpose must be determined at the instant of time which preceded the use of the weapon: R v Budhoo, 2015 ONCA 912 at paras 72-73
-
-
General
-
The fact that a weapon was used in a manner dangerous to the public peace does itself constitute the offence - but the formation of the unlawful purpose may be inferred from the circumstances in which the weapon was used: R v Budhoo, 2015 ONCA 912 at para 73
-
Possession of a Weapon or Firearm Obtained by Commission of Offence: S. 96(2)
-
Elements of the offence:
-
The accused was in possession of a firearm
-
The firearm was obtained by crime; and
-
The accused knew or was wilfully blind as to whether that the firearm had been obtained by crime: R v Jean, 2016 ONCA 137 at paras 10-11
-
The knowledge that the weapon was obtained by crime requires more than that the accused knows that his possesion is illegal (e.g., because he does not have a valid licence. The accused must:
-
know that the firearm was "obtained" by the commission of an offence that he committed (e.g., theft); OR
-
he must know that he is obtaining from another who obtained the firearm by the commission of an offence (e.g., knowing purchasing from someone he knows stole the firearm: R v Jean, 2016 ONCA 137 at para 14
-
Weapons Prohibition Order: Section 109
-
Despite a weapons prohibition order being mandatory under s.109(1)(c), if no judicial order is made, no order shall issue: R v. Shia, 2015 ONCA 190 at paras 34-38
Use of Weapon During Manslaughter: Section 236(a)
-
The use of a firearm by itself cannot be an aggravating consideration in sentencing under s. 236(a), because this provision already takes into account that a firearm was used in the commission of a manslaughter: R v Araya, 2015 ONCA 854
-
However, the circumstances surrounding the use of the firearm can constitute an aggravating factor
-